Legal Opinion
Rayco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Deutz Corporation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 3, 2010No. Case 5:08 CV 74PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID D. DOWD, JR., District Judge.
In this case, plaintiff Rayco Manufacturing, Inc. (Rayco) and intervening plaintiff, Fecon, Inc. (Fecon), claim that the Deutz defendants’ engines in equipment that they designed, manufactured and/or sold for use in the tree and landscape industry, failed when used for that purpose. Plaintiff and intervening plaintiff (collectively, plaintiffs) allege in their separate complaints that these engine failures constitute a breach of contract, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty for fitness of a particular purpose,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- NPE Enterprise, LLC v. PataqDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024