Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Scherbring

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2017No. S-15-610PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/22/2017 08:11 PM CST - 868 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports PUTNAM v. SCHERBRING Cite as

297 Neb. 868

M ark A. Putnam, appellant, v. K eri G. Scherbring et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed September 29, 2017. No. S-15-610. 1. Evidence: Appeal and Error. Generally, the control of discovery is a matter for judicial discretion, and decisions regarding discovery will be upheld on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. 2. Appeal and Error. Appellate review of a district court’s use…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PangbornNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Norquay v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Steinauer v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ChaunceyNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. SedlacekNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. AVG Partners I v. Genesis Health ClubsNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Houser v. American Paving AsphaltNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Carrizales v. Creighton St. JosephNebraska Supreme Court · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API