Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2018No. S-17-800PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCassel, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this product liability action, the district court excluded the claimant's expert's testimony regarding causation. Summary judgment for the manufacturer and distributor followed. On **49appeal, the claimant asserts that the exclusion exceeded the court's "gatekeeping" function. Because the record supports the court's conclusion that the expert's methodology was unreliable and conclusion-driven, we find no abuse of discretion in the exclusion and affirm the judgment.

II. BACKGROUND

Aimee Freeman brought a product liability action against Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., and Roche…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Schafersman v. Agland Coop.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. King v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ry. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  2. Weyh v. GottschNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Pitts v. Genie Indus., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Pitts v. Genie Indus.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Estate of Block v. Estate of BeckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API