Legal Opinion
Matter of Soto (Goldman)
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1960PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.
In this proceeding commenced by an order to show
cause, the respondent-appellant union appeals by permission from an order vacating an award of the New York State Board of Mediation, rendered in an arbitration between the respondent Lenscraft Optical Corp. (Bayex), as employer, and appellant union, as collective bargaining agent, under an agreement then in full force and effect, the validity of which had previously been upheld (cf. Rayex Corp. v. Sanchez, 6 A D 2d 902, motion for reargument denied 6 A D 2d 1044, motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals dismissed 5 N Y 2d 915). The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by29 opinions
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Donnelly v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Berlyn v. Board of Education of the East Meadow Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Nicholas Yanity, Raymond Gawrys and George Hartung v. Clinton Benware and International Association of MacHinistsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- William Mitchell v. United Parcel Service, Inc., and Department Store and Wholesale Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union 177Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.