Legal Opinion

Marc Lance Ford, Inc. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1969No. 69-87PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

The taxpayer contends that those automobiles removed from its new car inventory for use as demonstrators and officials’ cars and operated under dealer’s plates issued pursuant to Section 4503.27, Revised Code, should have been excluded from its inventory for personal property tax purposes. It bases this contention upon the part of Section 5701.03, Revised Code, which reads:

“As used in Title LVII of the Revised Code [providing for personal property taxation], ‘personal property’ includes every tangible thing which is the subject of ownership * * * other than * * * motor vehicles registered by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gruen Watch Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Zalud Oldsmobile, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Freightliner Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1969
  4. Zalud Oldsmobile, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API