Legal Opinion
State v. Ott
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 29, 1991No. 1218PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
In this case, the State charged Thomas E. Ott, III (appellee) with possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, and possession of drug paraphernalia. After a hearing on Ott’s motion to suppress the evidence, the Circuit Court for Frederick County granted the motion and the State (appellant) appeals to us from that ruling.
FACTS
Corporal James Fogle of the Frederick County Sheriff’s Office was the sole witness who testified at the suppression hearing. His testimony established the following facts:
On…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. FernonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Ott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992