Legal Opinion

Ott v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1992No. 31, September Term, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

325 Md. 206 (1992)

600 A.2d 111

THOMAS E. OTT, III

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND.

No. 31, September Term, 1991.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

January 13, 1992.

Victoria S. Lansburgh, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, both on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner/cross respondent.

Gary E. Bair, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., both on brief), Baltimore, for respondent/cross petitioner.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

This case presents for resolution the questions whether Thomas…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API