Legal Opinion
Mixteco Enterprises, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 12, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02106Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIXTECO ENTERPRISES, INC., Case No.: 3:25-cv-02106-BTM-MMP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS 14 [ECF NO. 12] 15 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATON, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Before the Court is Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23 12 (“MTD”)) Plaintiff Mixteco Enterprise’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 10 24 (“FAC”)). After considering the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS the 25 MTD without prejudice. 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 I. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.