Legal Opinion
United States v. Maddas
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 15, 1953No. Civ. A. 6432PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
This is a proceeding by the United States of America to enforce and foreclose certain tax liens against Frank A. Maddas, taxpayer, and those who claim a proprietary interest in the property of the debtor, pursuant to Section 3678 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3678.
The defendants, Frank A. Maddas, Laura C. Maddas, his wife, Nick J. Gentile and First Jeannette Bank and Trust Company, have not appeared or filed answers to the complaint and the United States of America is entitled to the relief prayed for in the complaint.
The defendants who contest the claim of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Citizens State Bank of Barstow, Tex. v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Mojac Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- United States v. Vassallo, Inc., Eugene Vassallo, County of New Castle, Delaware, City of Wilmington, Delaware, Domenick Nardo, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- United States v. CarlowDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Geitz v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- United States v. Olympic Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1988