Legal Opinion

United States v. Vassallo, Inc., Eugene Vassallo, County of New Castle, Delaware, City of Wilmington, Delaware, Domenick Nardo, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 4, 1960No. 12973_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STALEY, Circuit Judge.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the appellantintervenor, a transferee of the taxpayer, was bound by taxpayer’s execution of Tax Collection Waiver-Form 900, extending the assessment and collection period for corporate taxes beyond the original six-year period of limitations.

This action arose out of the efforts of the government, for at least the last decade, to collect individual and corporate income taxes from Eugene and Georgie Vassallo and Vassallo, Inc. Eugene Vassallo, individually and as sole shareholder and controlling officer of Vassallo,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vassallo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  2. United States v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. United States v. MarkowitzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1940
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1939
  5. United States v. MaddasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cary v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  2. United States v. MensikDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  3. United States v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  4. Cary v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Ryan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API