Legal Opinion

Clay v. Johnson

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 1, 1998No. 97 C 6007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

Ree Clay and Ruby Chivers (collectively “Plaintiffs”) instituted this action under the Truth In Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. (1998), against Iver R. Johnson and Marvin Bilfeld, d/b/a Davenport Construction Co. (collectively “Defendants”), alleging violations of TILA and seeking rescission of their transactions with Defendants. Plaintiffs now bring a motion for partial summary judgement on the issue of Defendants’ Lability under TILA. For the following reasons the Court holds that Defendants failed to properly…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mary S. Smith v. Don Chapman, D/B/A Don Chapman Motor SalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Cash for Payday, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  2. DeLeon v. Beneficial Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  3. Clay v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  4. Clay v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. Rendler v. Corus Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API