Steadman v. Pearl Assurance Company
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Justice.
We granted Certiorari in this matter to review a judgment of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit (127 So.2d 366), which affirmed a judgment of the trial court maintaining an exception of no right or cause of action filed by the defendant, Pearl Assurance Company, Limited. Article VII, Section 11, Louisiana Constitution of 1921, LSA.
On June 24, 1959,' defendant issued to plaintiff, Henry Steadman, Jr., a three year theft insurance policy covering “One man’s 14K yellow gold ring set with a diamond weighing approx. 2.85 carats, silver cape in color, American cut and containing a…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wright v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Isaac Bell, Inc. v. Security Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Hardy v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Nichols v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hart v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Calogero v. Safeway Ins. Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Wallace v. Hanover Insurance Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Offshore Logistics Services, Inc. v. Mutual Marine Office, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
- Sensat v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.