Legal Opinion

Branch v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1871 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

This is an appeal by Rachel Branch (Claimant) from an Order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying her requests for an appeal nunc pro tunc, a reinstatement of the compensation agreement between her and Somerset Knitting Mills (Employer), and a hearing de novo.

Claimant sustained a work-related injury on July 28, 1971, and began receiving benefits on August 4, *3761971. On January 22, 1973, Employer filed a petition to terminate, stating that Claimant was fully recovered and could return to work as of January 15, 1973. At the hearing on April 2,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. GainesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Dinges Transfer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. DigiacomoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. H.D. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Moore v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Larkin v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Stana v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Sewickley Valley Hospital v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API