Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Digiacomo

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1976No. Appeal, No. 1295 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The sole question for our review is whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) properly dismissed the petition of appeal of Joseph A. Digiacomo (Claimant) pursuant to Section 502 of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 when the appeal was postmarked twelve (12) days after the referee’s decision and was received thirteen (13) days after that decision.

Section 502 states in relevant part:

“The parties and the department shall be duly notified of the referee’s decision, and the reasons therefor, which shall be deemed the final decision of the board,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Di Francis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Branch v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Drafts v. Bennett Shelburne Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Cameron v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API