Legal Opinion
Williams v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 2012No. ED 96605PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.
Introduction
Earl Williams (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.151 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evi-dentiary Hearing (Rule 29.15 Motion). We affirm the result.
Background
In 2009, Movant was convicted after a bench trial of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and resisting lawful detention. The trial court sentenced Mov-ant to concurrent terms of ten years for the robbery conviction, and three years each for the remaining two convictions.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joseph v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- JOSEPH J. SAVICK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. JinkersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- ANDY JOE ALTIC, JR., Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- CEBRON CORDELL FINLEY, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.