Legal Opinion

In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Lands of Arnold

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1970No. 1409 and 1410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGueensey, J.

These appeals present the further development of some of the peculiar problems arising from the improvement of U. S. Route No. 25, hereinafter referred to as Route 25, in northwestern Ohio to satisfy Federal Interstate Highway System standards so that that highway might become a part of that system as Interstate Route No. 75, hereinafter referred to as 1-75, and constitute an extension of a series of appeals determined by this court respecting these problems, including In re Appropriation for Highway Purposes (Williams property), 6 Ohio App. 2d 6; In re Vacation of Road, 6 Ohio App. 2d 73,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Smith v. FlesherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smith v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  5. In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of WinkelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. State v. StrattonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. City of Norwood v. Highland Aerie No. 449Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API