Legal Opinion

Ikner v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 4, 1985No. 84-471PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case arose out of the collision of two motor vehicles. Linda Miller and James Robert Peters brought an action for negligence and wantonness against Clinton Ikner. The parties waived their right to a jury trial. The court found for the plaintiffs on the wantonness count. It awarded Miller $50,000.00 and Peters $7,500.00.

Miller and Ikner, who were employed at the Scott Paper Company in Mobile, dated for about two and a half years prior to October 1979. When their romantic relationship ended they did not part company on amicable terms. Miller subsequently began dating Peters. On the morning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mahone v. Birmingham Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Bailey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Seier v. PeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Johnson v. Jagermoore-Estes PropertiesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Clinton Melvin Ikner, Jr., Debtor. Linda L. Lee, F/k/a Linda Miller and Robert Peters v. Clinton Melvin Ikner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Welch v. Houston County Hosp. Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  4. Harris v. Jaquis (In Re Jaquis)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
  5. Mester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API