Legal Opinion
Erwin-Keith, Inc. v. Stewart
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided February 21, 2018No. CV–17–722PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The circuit further asked the following questions of Stewart Farms:
THE COURT : If you go to paragraph-the first page of the contract?
[ STEWART FARMS ]: Yes, sir.
THE COURT : It states, "This contract was made and accepted by the seller and Erwin-Keith, Inc. in the State of Arkansas and is governed by the laws of the State of Arkansas. Failure to notify Erwin-Keith of any discrepancies in body of this contract within 15 days of receipt will constitute acceptance." It says, "For additional information concerning the terms and conditions of the buyer, see the reverse side of this document." What…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alltel Corp. v. SumnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Asset Acceptance, LLC v. NewbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Alltel Corp. v. RosenowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- The Madison Cos., LLC v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
3Cited by8 opinions
- Altice USA, Inc., D/B/A Suddenlink Communications v. Sandra PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
- Altice USA, Inc., D/B/A Suddenlink Communications v. Pam and Jesse Runyan, Parents and Guardians of J.R., an Incapacitated PersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
- Altice USA, Inc., D/B/A Suddenlink Communications v. William CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
- Country Club Gardens, LLC v. D'Ann Pelton AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Altice USA, Inc., D/B/A Suddenlink Communications v. Ronnie Francis and Debbie FrancisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.