Legal Opinion

Mustang Production Co. v. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 1989No. 66047PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Appeal from Order No. 292454 of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission denying appellant Mustang Production Company’s request for increased density well in Cause CD No. 122434, and granting the request of appellee Hopper to respace the Morrow and Chester formations underlying Section 15 in Township 20 North, Range 18 West, Woodward County, Oklahoma, from 640 acre drilling and spacing units for gas, to 80 acre drilling and spacing units for oil production in Cause CD No. 119367.

In 1965, the Corporation Commission entered Order No. 61107, spacing the Chester formation underlying…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Yellow Transit Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Samson Resources Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Harding & Shelton, Inc. v. Sundown Energy, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API