Graham v. Graham
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
1. The authority of the presiding judge, fre quently referred to as plenary, Kniepkamp v. Richards, 192 Ga. 509 (2b) (16 SE2d 24), Moody v. Moody, 193 Ga. 699 (3), 702 (19 SE2d 504), Ponder v. Ponder, 198 Ga. 781 (2) (32 SE2d 801), to control the custody of minor children (under age 14) pending a divorce suit between their parents is very broad, so that in the exercise of sound discretion the judge may from time to time, until the final decree is entered, modify his orders in this respect and transfer the possession of the children from the persons to whom custody was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Ponder v. PonderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cooley v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
- Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- In Re Custody of CraigoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Rigdon v. RigdonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.