Ponder v. Ponder

Jenkjlxs, Presiding Justice.

1. It is the general rule that, where two courts have concurrent jurisdiction over a subject-matter and the parties, the court first taking jurisdiction will retain it unless some good reason be shown for equitable interference. Code, § 37-122; Morrison v. McFarland, 147 Ga. 465 (2) (94 S. E. 569). While the ordinary and the judge of the superior court have equal and concurrent jurisdiction in determining the custody Of the children of husband and wife living in a state of separatipn so far as habeas-corpus proceedings may be resorted to, it is only the judge of…