Moody v. Moody
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beid, Chief Justice.
The first contention of the plaintiff in error is that the court, at the interlocutory hearing in an action for divorce where the custody of two minor children was awarded to the wife, was without jurisdiction of the person of one of the children who was not present in court. The record shows that at the hearing the husband was represented by an attorney. There was no suggestion that the wife, husband, or minor child was not within the territorial jurisdiction of the court, nor was any plea to the jurisdiction filed. By statute the court is authorized, in an action for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Mollring v. MollringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Fortson v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.