Commerce Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Chadwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
This appeal — which is laden with fatal postural and jurisdictional infirmities— must be dismissed.
The dispositive issue is whether the order presented for review — which appoints a receiver to sell the defendant’s [appellant’s] interest in certain corporate stock — is ap-pealable under 12 O.S.Supp.1980 § 993(a)(4). We hold that the order under consideration in this case does not constitute a reviewable disposition.
This was a proceeding to apply judgment debtor’s [Chadwell’s] interest in certain stocks toward satisfaction of the judgment in favor of appellee bank [Bank]. After…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. Incorporated City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Estate of O'Bannon v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Pippin v. McVickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Blackburn v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- International Chiropractic Congress v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Hermetics Switch, Inc. v. SalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983