Legal Opinion

Commerce Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Chadwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 13, 1981No. 55052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

This appeal — which is laden with fatal postural and jurisdictional infirmities— must be dismissed.

The dispositive issue is whether the order presented for review — which appoints a receiver to sell the defendant’s [appellant’s] interest in certain corporate stock — is ap-pealable under 12 O.S.Supp.1980 § 993(a)(4). We hold that the order under consideration in this case does not constitute a reviewable disposition.

This was a proceeding to apply judgment debtor’s [Chadwell’s] interest in certain stocks toward satisfaction of the judgment in favor of appellee bank [Bank]. After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Incorporated City of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Estate of O'Bannon v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Pippin v. McVickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Blackburn v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. International Chiropractic Congress v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Hermetics Switch, Inc. v. SalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API