Kosak v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal the judgment of conviction was reversed not for want of evidence to sustain it but for error in the charge. The mandate noted reversal of the judgment without specifically directing a venire de novo. When the case came to be listed for re-trial in the District Court, the defendant objected on the ground that the judgment of reversal was the legal equivalent of a judgment of acquittal and that, accordingly, a re-trial would subject him to double jeopardy. Thereupon the government moved this court to recall the mandate and amend it by directing a new trial.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Steinman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Martin J. Cote Patricia S. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lefco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Federal Reserve Bank v. Ocean CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937