Legal Opinion

Steinman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 8, 1911No. 1,440 (69)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. E. H. Steinman was convicted of aiding and abetting the willful misapplication of the funds of a national bank, and brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

By an indictment found in the court below in 1908, Charles E. Mullin, cashier of the Farmers’ & Mechanics’ National Bank of Mt. Pleasant, Pennsylvania, was charged, under section 5209 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497), with willfully misapplying the funds of that bank with intent to injure and defraud the said banking association, for the use, benefit and advantage of a certain corporation in the state of Pennsylvania, of which the plaintiff in error, E. H. Steinman, was president, to wit, the Acme Lumber” & Supply Company. By the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Hopt v. PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Ryan v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lefco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  2. Miklencic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
  3. Kosak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API