Legal Opinion
Convertino v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 10, 2009No. Civil Action 04-0236 (RCL)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs Motion [116] to Compel Production from defendant. Upon consideration of the plaintiffs motion, the defendant’s opposition [129] thereto, the plaintiffs reply [145] brief, the defendant’s surreply [149], the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the plaintiffs motion will be DENIED. The Court’s reasoning is set forth below.
Upon consideration of Jonathan Tukel’s Motion and Memorandum of Law to Intervene in Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- National Whistleblower Center v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Holmes v. Petrovich Development Co. LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- American Petroleum Tankers Parent, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Reserve Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.