Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Seaton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1923No. 23,494PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is by defendant from a judgment on the pleadings. On December 11, 1918, plaintiff and defendant entered a contract for the exchange of properties. The complaint alleges full performance, save as to one item, and, for defendant’s failure to 'perform as to that, judgment was asked. The provision of the exchange contract in respect thereto is this: “And the party of the first part [defendant] further agrees to properly assign and guarantee to the party of the second part [plaintiff] one certain contract for deed, made on the 14th day of November, A. D. 1918, by and between R. J.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kimball v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Resser v. CarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Ogden v. BallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Fulton v. Town of RivertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ethen v. Reed Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API