Ogden v. Ball
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, refusing a new trial after a trial by Lochren, J., a jury being waived.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
It is satisfactorily established by the record that on the 20th day of April, 1882, the plaintiff purchased of the defendants the village lot in controversy, and received their deed therefor, executed in due form, and in consideration thereof paid them the sum of $700. This deed contained the usual covenants of seisin, and for quiet enjoyment and peaceable possession. The plaintiff thereupon entered into possession, and in good faith made permanent improvements upon the premises of the value of $4,000. Thereafter, and while so in possession, she was notified by the heirs of one Ezekiel Tripp…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Noonan v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Scriver v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Fritz v. PuseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- McGary v. HastingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Fowler v. PolingNew York Supreme Court · 1849
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sandwich Mfg. Co. v. ZellmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Hayden v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Efta v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Leet v. GratzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Hoyt v. RotheWashington Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.