Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Crisostomo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1982No. 81-4305PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

689 F.2d 869

25 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 1238, 95 Lab.Cas. P 34,265,

11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1711

Raymond J. DONOVAN, Secretary of Labor, United States

Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Luis CRISOSTOMO, Individually and d/b/a L & T Builders, and

Teresita Crisostomo, Individually, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 81-4305.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 13, 1982.

Decided Oct. 7, 1982.

Mark E. Cowan, Arriola & Cowan, Agana, Guam, for defendants-appellants.

Sandra Lord, Washington, D. C., argued for plaintiff-appellee; T. Timothy Ryan, Jr., Sol. of Labor, Beate Bloch,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brian F. Monahan v. County Of Chesterfield, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  2. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jacobs v. Clark County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Monahan v. County of ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. Sara Conner v. Cleveland County, NCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API