Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dorsey v. United Technologies Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 9, 1997Published

1Concurrence

BERDON, J., with whom MCDONALD, J.,

joins, concurring. I agree that the petition by the plaintiff, Stanley Dorsey, for certification for appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court1 in this workers’ compensation case should be granted, the judgment of the Appellate Court should be vacated and the case remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of Discuillo v. Stone & Webster, 242 Conn. 570, 698 A.2d 873 (1997). Although the majority assumes that this direction to the Appellate Court provides sufficient guidance, I write separately to expound on Discuillo.

In Discuillo, we were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Dubois v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Dorsey v. United Technologies Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API