Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. United Technologies Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 15, 1997No. AC 16378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the workers’ compensation review board1 (board) reversing the commissioner’s decision granting the plaintiffs claim for compensation benefits. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the board improperly (1) applied the one year statute of limitations, (2) failed to extend the statute of limitations for a repetitive trauma claim beyond one year from the date of last exposure where there is no known manifestation of an injury within the *709one year period, (3) denied the plaintiffs rights to due process, and (4) reversed the commissioner’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Gil v. Courthouse OneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Williams v. Best Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. KiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Dorsey v. United Technologies Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Dorsey v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API