Legal Opinion
Hellman v. Union Central Life Insurance
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 10, 2001No. 3:00-0537PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOHN T. NIXON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Heilman sued Defendant, Union Central Life Insurance Company (“UCLI”), seeking damages for alleged breach of the insurance contract between the parties. (Doc. No. 1, Cmplt.) Pending before the Court are the parties cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, and accompanying memoranda. (Doc. Nos 17 and 18, PI. S.J. Memoranda, and Doc. Nos. 22 and 23, Def. S.J. Mem-oranda.) Both parties have filed corresponding Responses (Doc. Nos. 28 and 30), and Replies (Doc. Nos. 35 and 36). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stanford v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Colby v. Assurant Employee BenefitsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Corrington v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Stanford v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Stanford v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008