Legal Opinion

Corrington v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided February 20, 2003No. 01-2446 M1/APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MCCALLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is the first of four pending motions for summary judgment that have been filed by Defendants. In this motion, filed August 1, 2002 and titled Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants request judgment in their favor on the grounds that Plaintiff Corrington’s illness first manifested itself prior to the effective date of the insurance policy and is, therefore, not covered by the terms of the policy. Plaintiff responded in opposition on September 3, 2002. Defendants filed a reply brief on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Douglas Emmons v. Robert McLaughlin Donald Ratliff, Gary Dewalt, City of Norwalk, Reese WinemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty, Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
  2. Sharp v. Valley Forge Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API