Legal Opinion

McKee v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1982No. 54312PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the manufacturer of an intrauterine contraceptive device [IUD] has the duty to directly warn the ultimate consumer, or if a warning to the physician of possible side effects is sufficient.

Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation [Or-tho], appellee, is the manufacturer of the Lippes Loop, an IUD. One of these devices was inserted by Dr. George Moore in the uterus of Carol Ann McKee, appellant. Five years later, after a pregnancy, a miscarriage, a tubal ligation, and during a hysterectomy, it was discovered that the IUD had perforated the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API