McKee v. Moore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the manufacturer of an intrauterine contraceptive device [IUD] has the duty to directly warn the ultimate consumer, or if a warning to the physician of possible side effects is sufficient.
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation [Or-tho], appellee, is the manufacturer of the Lippes Loop, an IUD. One of these devices was inserted by Dr. George Moore in the uterus of Carol Ann McKee, appellant. Five years later, after a pregnancy, a miscarriage, a tubal ligation, and during a hysterectomy, it was discovered that the IUD had perforated the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.