Legal Opinion

Crorow Hardwood Co. v. Burks

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1928No. 26917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree for the appellee against the appellant, for the value of trees cut and removed by the appellant from land owned by the appellee.

In December, 1903, Joseph Burks, who then owned the land, conveyed to R. C. Coldwell “all the standing, live, round, and growing timber, except pine and water oak, ’ ’ growing thereon. The deed stipulated that:

“The said R. C. Coldwell and his assigns shall have the right to enter upon said land at any time during a period of twenty years from date hereof, . . . and that he and his assigns shall have the right to cut and remove said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ladnier v. Ingram Day Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Fitzgerald v. LibbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finkbine Lumber Co. v. SaucierMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Schoemaker v. MeadowsNew York County Court, Chautauqua County · 1939
  3. Smith v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Sumter Lbr. Co. Inc. v. SkipperMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API