Legal Opinion

Smith v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1928No. 27106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Appeal and Error, 4CJ, p. 696, n. 6; Logs and Logging, 38CJ, p. 152, n. 56; p. 164, n. 25, 28. As to effect of contract with regard to standing timber to pass title to same, see annotation in 6 L.R.A. (N.S.) 468; 47 L.R.A. (N.S.) 870; 17 R.C.L. 1062; 3 R.C.L. Supp. 760; 4 R.C.L. Supp. 1170; 7 R.C.L. Supp. 585. As to effect of expiration of time removal of timber, see annotation in 47 L.R.A. (N.S.) 882; 17 R.C.L. 1085. The appellants, who were the complainants in the court below, brought this suit against the appellees for the partition of the pine timber…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deer Creek Lumber Co. v. SheetsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ladnier v. Ingram Day Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sutton v. Gray Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Finkbine Lumber Co. v. SaucierMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Wheat v. J. J. White Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sumter Lbr. Co. Inc. v. SkipperMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API