Smith v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Appeal and Error, 4CJ, p. 696, n. 6; Logs and Logging, 38CJ, p. 152, n. 56; p. 164, n. 25, 28. As to effect of contract with regard to standing timber to pass title to same, see annotation in 6 L.R.A. (N.S.) 468; 47 L.R.A. (N.S.) 870; 17 R.C.L. 1062; 3 R.C.L. Supp. 760; 4 R.C.L. Supp. 1170; 7 R.C.L. Supp. 585. As to effect of expiration of time removal of timber, see annotation in 47 L.R.A. (N.S.) 882; 17 R.C.L. 1085. The appellants, who were the complainants in the court below, brought this suit against the appellees for the partition of the pine timber…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deer Creek Lumber Co. v. SheetsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Ladnier v. Ingram Day Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- Sutton v. Gray Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Finkbine Lumber Co. v. SaucierMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- Wheat v. J. J. White Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sumter Lbr. Co. Inc. v. SkipperMississippi Supreme Court · 1938