Hall v. Myotte
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION STACY G. HALL, CV 16–58–H–DLC Plaintiff, ORDER v. BUDDY MYOTTE, et al., Defendants. Before the Court is Plaintiff Stacy G. Hall’s Motion for Stipulation of Supplemental Jurisdiction. (Doc. 107.) For the reasons dicussed below, the Court denies the motion. Hall moves for a stipulation that this Court exercise its supplemental jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1367
over state law claims. (Id.) Typically, a stipulation occurs between the parties, making the Court’s involvement unnecessary. Thus, the Court will interpret this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Raygor v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jinks v. Richland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust Trustees for the Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust v. Desert Valley Landscape & Maintenance, Inc., and Hartford Fire Insurance Company Rich Manuli, Jr. Richard Manuli, Construction Industry Pension Construction Industry/laborers Joint Trustees Construction Industry/laborers Vacation Trustees v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company Hartford Fire Insurance Company Richardson Construction, Inc., and Rich Manuli, Jr. M & H Enterprises, Inc., Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust Trustees for the Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust v. Desert Valley Landscape Maintenance, Inc., and Hartford Fire Insurance Company Rich Manuli, Jr. Richard ManuliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Stanko v. RowtonMontana Supreme Court · 2000