Legal Opinion

Raygor v. Regents of the University of Minnesota

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 2000No. 00-1514PublishedCited by 283 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

In federal court, petitioners asserted state law claims under the supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 U. S. C. *536§ 1367 (1994 ed.), against respondent university, an arm of the State of Minnesota. Those claims were dismissed on Eleventh Amendment grounds, and petitioners refiled them in state court past the period of limitations. The supplemental jurisdiction statute purports to toll the period of limitations for supplemental claims while they are pending in federal court and for 30 days after they are dismissed. § 1367(d). The Minnesota Supreme Court held that provision unconstitutional when…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by283 opinions

  1. Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Ali v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Artis v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

278 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API