Swichtenberg v. Brimer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
171 Ariz. 77 (1991)
828 P.2d 1218
Marvin R. SWICHTENBERG and Rose Swichtenberg, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jack BRIMER and Jane Doe Brimer, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.
1 CA-CV 88-532.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.
September 19, 1991.
Review Denied May 5, 1992.[*]
Schmitt & Associates, P.C. by Peter F. Fisher, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Stinson & Roberts by Edwin R. Roberts, Phoenix, for defendants-appellees.
OPINION
TAYLOR, Judge.
Marvin R. Swichtenberg appeals from a judgment dismissing his negligence action against defendant Jack Brimer. The…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Guy v. Arthur H. Thomas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Jansen v. HarmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.