Legal Opinion

Swichtenberg v. Brimer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 19, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 88-532Published

1Opinion of the Court

171 Ariz. 77 (1991)

828 P.2d 1218

Marvin R. SWICHTENBERG and Rose Swichtenberg, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Jack BRIMER and Jane Doe Brimer, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.

1 CA-CV 88-532.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

September 19, 1991.

Review Denied May 5, 1992.[*]

Schmitt & Associates, P.C. by Peter F. Fisher, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stinson & Roberts by Edwin R. Roberts, Phoenix, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

Marvin R. Swichtenberg appeals from a judgment dismissing his negligence action against defendant Jack Brimer. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Williams v. HartshornNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Guy v. Arthur H. Thomas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Jansen v. HarmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API