Legal Opinion
Rachelson v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 16, 1966No. Civ. A. 36632, 36643PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, employees of the Sterling Equipment Company, have instituted these actions against the defendants because of alleged injuries sustained as a result of inhalation of and exposure to vapors of a duPont product called “val-clene” which had escaped from dryclean-ing machines manufactured by Vic Manufacturing Company. The inhalation and exposure allegedly took place over a period of months in 1962 at various locations in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
The issue now. before us is the motion of Vic Manufacturing Co. to dismiss the complaint or in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Feller v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cunningham v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Industrial Pressing & Packaging, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Optico Corporation v. Standard Tool CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Meench v. Raymond Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Nelson ex rel. Nelson v. Doll Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Alloway v. Wain-Roy Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.