Legal Opinion
Optico Corporation v. Standard Tool Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 1968No. Civ. A. 42931PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff has instituted this action against Standard Tool Company to recover damages for breach of a contract whereby defendant had agreed to manufacture a two-cavity injection mold to plaintiff’s specifications and based upon models to be supplied by plaintiff. The defendant, on whom service of process was made pursuant to Rule 4(d) (3) of the F.R.Civ.P., has moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the F.R.Civ.P., to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction over the person and improper venue; or, in the event jurisdiction and venue are proper, a stay…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Miller v. Kiamesha-Concord, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Benn v. Linden Crane Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Industrial Pressing & Packaging, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Athletes Foot of Delaware, Inc. v. Ralph Libonati Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- In Re Puerto Rico Air Disaster LitigationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.