Legal Opinion

Nelson ex rel. Nelson v. Doll Furniture Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1969No. Civ. A. Nos. 43305, 43329PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANNUM, District Judge.

The issue upon which disposition of these motions lies is whether the defendant, Phillips and Martin Company, was “doing business” in Pennsylvania within the meaning of the applicable statute.

Phillips and Martin Company, (hereinafter defendant), has moved for summary judgment in both of these cases, or in the alternative, to quash service of process.

These are suits for personal injury arising out of an explosion which occurred on or about July 31, 1967 at Yardley, Pennsylvania. William Nelson died following the accident and Albertus Van Der Meer was burned.

Defenda…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Myers v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Miller v. Kiamesha-Concord, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Cecere v. Ohringer Home Furniture Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Industrial Pressing & Packaging, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Benn v. Linden Crane CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In Re Puerto Rico Air Disaster LitigationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
  4. Parise v. AAA Warehouse CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Boeing Company v. Spar Aerospace Products Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API