Ruffin v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
In every criminal jury trial, the trial court is required to instruct the jury that the defendant is presumed innocent, that in order to convict the defendant of the charged crime the State must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the jury has a duty to acquit in the absence of such proof. Merzbacher v. State, 346 Md. 391, 398, 697 A.2d 432, 436 (1997). The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court’s jury instruction on the presumption *357of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt was erroneous because it deviated from the Maryland…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Savoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Armacost v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.