Legal Opinion

Oswianza v. Wengler & Mandell, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1934No. 22474 Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Defendant in error brought suit in the municipal court of Chicago to recover the principal and interest due on four matured bonds of $500 each, with interest coupons attached thereto in the amount of $15 each, which had been issued by plaintiff in error and secured by a trust deed. The cause was tried before the court on a stipulation of fact and judgment was entered against plaintiff in error for $2090. The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment, and this court granted a petition for writ of certiorari.

The stipulation concedes defendant in error’s title to the bonds, the amount of the bonds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Page v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Crosthwaite v. Moline Plow Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Abdul-Karim v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mateyka v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Provident Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Realty Centre, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Chicago Title and Trust Co. v. RobinIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Conerty v. RichtsteigIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API