Herland v. Izatt
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice DURRANT,
opinion of the Court:
Introduction
T 1 The right to bear arms is enshrined in both the United States and Utah Constitutions. But with that right comes responsibilities-a principle our Legislature has recognized by placing certain restrictions on gun ownership. These include restrictions on supplying firearms to minors and individuals who are incompetent or impaired. 1 In this case we are asked to determine whether gun owners have a duty in tort to exercise reasonable care in supplying their guns to intoxicated individuals. We conclude a gun owner does have such a duty.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Jupin v. KaskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scott v. Universal Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
- Armenta v. A.S. Horner, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Fitzgerald v. Spearhead InvestmentsUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Kirk v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Tooele County v. Erda Community AssociationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.