Legal Opinion

Neal v. Cure

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2010No. 49A04-0908-CV-468PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

William and Elizabeth Cure owned commercial property in Martinsville They leased it from 1986 to 1991 to a dry-cleaning tenant, Masterwear, who used perchloroethylene ("PCE") as a solvent. In 1996, the Neals, who own property nearby and operated a business there, were having health problems. The value of their property had been decreased by PCE in the soil and in the air inside their building. The Neals sued Masterwear and the Cures for environmental contamination under the Environmental Legal Act ("ELA"), 1 nuisance, trespass, and negli-genee. The Cures were granted summary…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Filip v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McSwane v. Bloomington Hospital & Healthcare SystemIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. RushfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WysockiIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. 5200 Keystone Ltd. Realty, LLC v. Filmcraft Laboratories, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Haber Land Co. v. Am. Steel City Indus. Leasing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
  4. JDN Properties, LLC v. Vanmeter Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Broad Ripple Property Group, LLC v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API