Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Razoux

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 16, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This is an application for reargument of a motion to strike out certain portions of an answer in a discovery proceeding which was decided adversely to the applicant (154 Misc. 128). Both motions are typical of an increasing number of similar proceedings which have become the bane of certain other courts of this State, and which will, if encouraged, result in transforming the procedure of this court from one in which substance is paramount to a mere web of technical rules, promoting no good purpose and efficacious only to trap the inexperienced or unwary suitor.

Perhaps such a highly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LarneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of MarkowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of RosenblathNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of RazouxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HollingerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API