Legal Opinion

Hotchkiss v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 13097PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

[1] Petitioners filed an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to settle a proposed bill of exceptions preparatory to an appeal from a judgment against sureties on an appeal bond entered on motion after the affirmance of the judgment appealed from. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 942.)

From the facts alleged in the petition for the writ it appears that, on timely motion, the appeal of the sureties from the judgment will have to be dismissed. (Duerr v. Sloan, 50 Cal.App. 512, 516 [195 P. 475]. See, also, Meredith v. SantaClara etc. Assn., 60 Cal. 617, 621, and Gray v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Duerr v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. HodgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API