Legal Opinion

State v. Katon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 4, 1998No. 96-359PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

Defendant Philip J. Katon, who pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of domestic assault, appeals from the order of the district court revoking his probation and imposing the underlying sentence. Defendant contends that his right to due process of the law was abridged when his probation was revoked after he was found ineligible to participate in a program required as part of his probation. We affirm.

In February 1995, based on an agreement with the prosecution, defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of domestic assault. The charge was supported by the arresting officer’s affidavit of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. MacE v. AmestoyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1991
  5. State v. FiskSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Westley A. AlbrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. Michael HarwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  3. In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  4. In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API