Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Anthony Bridger

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 25, 2017No. 2016-142Published

1DissentEaton, J.

¶ 34. For many reasons, I dissent. The majority holds that for a plea to be voluntary, Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(f) requires "some recitation on the record of the facts underlying the charge and some admission by the defendant to those facts." Ante, ¶ 21.8 The majority does not address the history of Rule 11(f), its plain language, or the unvaried federal case law decided under the identical rule, none of which supports the unduly rigid interpretation of Rule 11(f) that the majority adopts. The majority also assumes the answer to a threshold, but unaddressed, question of whether…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. SchminkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API